Who came up with the idea of using age for defining baby sizes anyway? 0-3 months, 3-6 months, etc. only works if your baby is normal (I'm assuiming), and Andrew is decidedly not normal. He's currently wearing clothing marked 3-6 months and he's close to outgrowing them.
To make matters worse, it doesn't look like everyone agrees what these age categories are either, so one brand may fit a bit bigger or smaller than another. Wouldn't it have made more sense to measure baby clothes based on length?
The only ones I'd think this kind of size definitions would help would be for people who're buying baby clothes to give as gifts.
And to a certain extent, it feels vaguely judgemental. Is your baby underperforming if they're 8 months and still don't fit in the 6-9 months size? Ridiculous.
No comments:
Post a Comment